Published on July 16, 2004 By Madine In Democrat
John Edwards' speech about "Two Americas" was a centerpiece of his presidential campaign. While the message is not as prominent in the Kerry-Edwards ticket, Kerry has embraced it.

The crux of the Two Americas message is that one America is working hard and struggling to pay bills, and the other America is awash in money and not contributing enough to society.

Is this an accurate portrayal of America today? Intuitively, Edwards' message makes sense. Health care costs are rising. College costs are rising. Insurance costs are rising. Surely something must be wrong.

The middle class certainly is facing problems in America. But that is only one of Edwards' Americas. The problems, according to Edwards, are the result of the harmful actions or inactions of the other America, the rich. The rich are sitting by the pool and soaking up tax breaks while the working Americans are out in the cold. Is that true? Are the problems in America the result of the rich?

Perhaps the best anecdotal counter to the slothful characterization of rich America would be John Edwards. Edwards has talked about how he went from being the son of a mill worker to being an attorney who stood up for the little guy. Edwards prides himself as being a champion of ordinary people against big companies, and he proclaims that his work made society better. Now, I don't neccessarily agree with all of the positions Edwards took as a lawyer. But I do believe that Edwards worked hard. I'm sure he worked long hours and traveled a great deal during his career as an attorney. John Edwards is very wealthy today, worth tens of millions of dollars. He didn't get that money stting by a pool phoning his stock broker. He got it because he worked as an attorney.

John Edwards wants to raise capital gains and dividend taxes on the rich. I can't understand why this makes sense. Investment creates jobs. That's right, investment creates jobs. Taxes on things like cigarettes and alcohol are sometimes called "sin taxes" because they are partly designed to discourage people using those products. Why should we have a "sin tax" on investment? Surely job creation is not a sin!

So no, I don't think are two Americas. I think there is one America, and we all have to work together to solve our problems regardless of our net worth.

Two Americas speech at Iowa

Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Jul 29, 2004
"essentially, many poor suffer from learning disabilities and sometimes mental illness. What's your world-view of that? Sympathy? No sympathy?"


I've lived and worked in one of the poorest areas in America, and I don't see it, Jay. Those who did seem to lag behind intellectually actually seemed much better suited for local employment, whereas the more intelligent tended to reject the "work-a-day" jobs that were available in the area. I think, if anything, it is an underestimation of the employment pool in these areas, combined with an apathy to educate these populations, that causes a lot of the poverty.

Sadly, that is spurred on by the very mischaracterization you are perpetuating. People don't bother to promote much post-grad education efforts into these areas, and as a result businesses that require more education tend to overlook this areas. It is changing slowly, but it is held back by the "fly-over America" mentality that ignores the fact that some of our best and brightest have come from the poorest of circumstances.
on Jul 29, 2004
Actually CS Guy...i can...I worked for an accounting firm who handles quite a number of wealthy peoples money. If you only knew the lengths that they go to, to get out of paying up it would make you sick.

As far as living in a large city, i live in Salt Lake City, if you had any clue you would know that it is one of the cheapest cities in America as far as cost of living goes. I have lived in other cities that cost a hell of a lot more.

And as far as me not having kids i cant afford...well i have ONE, and hes going to inherit the burden that all of the tax breaks for the weathiest 2% of this country are racking up . thats really f****ed up too.

And just so you know. I make plenty to take care of my own at this time in my life. I never asked anyone for anything, and never will.

You also take issue with my point of saying there will always be haves and have nots. What i meant is that maybe someday we can finally figure out a way that we can reduce the number of people that dont have anything, and maybe give em a little hope. Sorta like the old saying "give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and he can feed himself for a lifetime" Ther will always be deadbeats that will try to milk the system. And that sucks too. It takes away from those who need help.

I have no problem with someone who has a truckload of money. America is a country that prides itself on the belief that you can get to that level if you work for it. My problem is with the people who dont feel like they have to pay their fair share. It does exist, it IS quite common in the top 2%, and anyone who doesnt believe that is either naive....or a complete idiot.

on Jul 29, 2004
As far as living in a large city, i live in Salt Lake City, if you had any clue you would know that it is one of the cheapest cities in America as far as cost of living goes. I have lived in other cities that cost a hell of a lot more.

And as far as me not having kids i cant afford...well i have ONE, and hes going to inherit the burden that all of the tax breaks for the weathiest 2% of this country are racking up . thats really f****ed up too.

You are the one that brought these issues up as a problem towards maintaining a certain standard of living. You are the one that said, "Kids," and not "Kid." And do you know the cost of living in every city? Why the personal attacks here?

It does exist, it IS quite common in the top 2%, and anyone who doesnt believe that is either naive....or a complete idiot.

Again, show some proof if you are going to make such a sweeping statement. Your anecdotal say-so is useless, and anyone who doesn't realize that is either naive or a complete idiot (and ellipses are three periods, not four). Maybe your firm just does business with a high percentage of unscrupulous people. What is the average percentage that these people pay in taxes?

Are these people performing illegal acts? If not, then I don't blame them one bit for trying to retain control of as much of their money as possible. I'm sure the poor do that as well.
on Jul 29, 2004
Well first of all, most pay between 15% and 25% due to sheltering, offshoring can shave up to 6% even more depending on how you structure and move it, (whereas i am taxed at around 30% and the only sheltering i do is an IRA) and i noticed that you feel the need to point out two typos. It just proves that you have no valid arguement and have to resort to such a petty act to feel self important. You are quite the orator, give yourself a big pat on the back. You earned it.

By the way i worked for SmithBarney/Travelers. I no longer do it due to the fact its such a sleazy business and now i work in IT. The pay is better, and routers don't cheat on their taxes. I also travel most of the year, and read newspapers, watch local TV, talk to people, and pay attention. Its not very difficult to establish what the cost of living in different areas of the country.

One last thing...(noticeTHREE this time) Poor folks dont have to hide their money...They dont have any, thats why their poor

And cheating on your taxes is a FELONY. Thats a crime right?
on Jul 30, 2004
Obama did not talk about two america's... he came from poverty and he was easily the only speaker at the Demo convention (including Kerry) that actually made sense. Of course you could only see him on cable TV. The big three networks weren't showing him. Obama was not liberal enough.
on Jul 30, 2004
Sadly, that is spurred on by the very mischaracterization you are perpetuating.


I'm not sure what "mischaracterization" I'm perpetuating. Please refer to my article over here Link which gives factual information about their situation.

The mentally ill and the those with learning disabilities are far more likely to live in poverty, to be welfare recipients, etc. But because it's invisible to the naked eye, many people assume there's nothing wrong with these folks. In regards to the learning disabled, they have lots of problems that compound their troubles finding and holding a decent job. Literacy is often low in this group, and they have trouble adapting. I get to see this up front - I talk to parents of those with these type of problems - it's really tough getting them to accept that things have changed. This affects them both on the job, and also when they lose their jobs. In a nutshell, they just don't have what able-minded people would describe as mental toughness (on the whole - OK there's always exceptions), or reasonable mental agility.

When you've been on the front lines seeing these people as kids - as I have - you'd realize that I'm not just talking "through my hat". Unless you lacked the most basic elements of perception, I suspect you'd quickly begin to see why they end up where they do.

JW

on Jul 30, 2004
And cheating on your taxes is a FELONY. Thats a crime right?

So how many of these people did you report, if you were privy to such damning information?

You are quite the orator, give yourself a big pat on the back. You earned it.

This is not oratory. You might want to work on that vocabulary.

Well first of all, most pay between 15% and 25% due to sheltering, offshoring can shave up to 6% even more depending on how you structure and move it

And we just take your word for this? Do you have any regional or national research that shows this, or are you just sharing anecdotal figures?
on Jul 30, 2004

When you say "able-bodied" does that mean, that if the body is OK, but the mind is mushy ... what are your thoughts then? I've discussed some of these problems that the poor face, over here .... Link ... essentially, many poor suffer from learning disabilities and sometimes mental illness. What's your world-view of that? Sympathy? No sympathy?

Depends on the severity of the mental disability. It woudl ahve to be pretty severe though.  I've seen "emotional" disabilities (first hand) used to get on the government dole. Anxiety disorders, for instance, I think are undeserving of government aid.  Those who feel sympathy for thos epeople are certainly free to give to charities.

on Jul 30, 2004
"I'm not sure what "mischaracterization" I'm perpetuating"


It wasn't your hat I was imagining you talking through. The mischaracterization is that the poor are somehow less intelligent, or that the "poor" is even a cohesive class here. You have no idea how many "kinds" of people are lumped into the "poverty" statistics here, many of them without regard to their actual standard of living or well-being. Folks like you still abuse their numbers to make your points, though.

No matter how politically correct you put it, your argument benefits from the *stereotype* that people who are poor are less intelligent. You perpetuate that stereotype here and in your other article. That sterotype has caused a great amount of pain and is a major road-block in helping the "poor".

I read your other article, and as someone that has lived and worked around the poor every day of my life, I found it unworthy to comment on. Your posts about the American "poor" are akin to the old "three blind men and the elephant" story. You can sit up there and peer at the platonic shadows on the wall, but your arguments are semantic excercises, whereas the people you wield actually have to live here with the results of "social experiments".


on Jul 30, 2004
It wasn't your hat I was imagining you talking through.


OK BakerS, I think that's far enough. If you can't keep your comments civil, then I'm not going to debate with you any longer. This is nonsense.

Folks like you still abuse their numbers to make your points, though.


What numbers have I abused? Point to them please! WHERE ARE THEY! PLEASE! WHERE???

Sorry, many - BUT NOT ALL - poor, yes, have some major real obstacles to overcome that most folks just don't. Pretending these obstacles don't exist doesn't make it so.

Semantic exercises? I've seen it first hand with my own child, due to a learning disability, which, thank God, has been somewhat reduced. I see it in the children I test - and the ones I work with to help them overcome their learning handicaps. Closing our eyes and saying it ain't so, doesn't make that little wish happen. NO matter how much I wish that were the case.

JW
on Jul 30, 2004
I get so tired of your senstivities. You say:

"... you'd realize that I'm not just talking "through my hat". Unless you lacked the most basic elements of perception, I suspect you'd quickly begin to see why they end up where they do."


You make an obnoxious post about how I haven't had as much experience with poor children, when I have lived in and around Appalacia all my life, in some of the poorest counties in some of the poorest states in the US. I *was* a poor child, you ass. I doubt your sensitivity to my comments, your "experience" with the poor, and even your sympathy for them. More semantic arguments from the eternal Canadian critic.

I know as much about real poverty as you do, *easily*, thanks. If you are going to be insulted easily, I suggest you check your own tone.
on Jul 30, 2004
Well, it's one thing if the whole, say, state is poor. This is obviously different than where the poor have concentrated in pockets due to economics (ie housing costs).

And stop worrying about my country of origin so much - I'll comment on whatever the hell I want. This is the internet, man. If you want to stay parochial, then, you should avoid the computer. You might get some wider information that way. BTW almost all of the statistics I quoted were from the US.

JW


PS Given that you both doubt my sincerity - essentially calling me a liar - and refuse to point out the numbers you claim I'm abusing - which effectively makes the charge that I'm lying, I'm unwilling to engage with you in this blog any further. Goodbye.
on Jul 30, 2004
" nd stop worrying about my country of origin so much - I'll comment on whatever the hell I want."


You can, but you're blowing hot air if you pretend to be authoritative on the subject. You take your experiences in Canada and gild them with pliable US statistics and pretend you have some sort of insight. If you want to talk about Canadian poor and Canadian special needs children by all means do so.

But don't you f*cking dare try and make statements like "When you've been on the front lines seeing these people as kids - as I have - you'd realize..." Your patronizing tone only goes so far, and trying to tell me that I haven't the benefit of your vast experience with the poor makes me a little ill. I worked summers in one of the poorest counties in the nation... at a camp for vacationing rich kids with mental disabilities. I also spent summers tutoring wealthy college students so their GPAs would rise enough to admit them back into the posh schools they had been tossed out of. I have spent time tutoring both rich and poor, and I find no preponderance of intelligence in the wealty.
on Jul 30, 2004
Fuddle duddle, as PET was once claimed to say.

JW
on Jul 30, 2004
We should all take a step back and ponder Eswiv's wise words. 
3 Pages1 2 3